… Ecommerce, Internet Security, Economics, and Entrepreneurship

Category: Portable Trust & Reputation Signals

Stop Worrying! How to Solve the eCommerce Trust Problem.

Jeff Grass, buySAFE’s CEO, recently posted a comprehensive article on the eCommerce Trust problem, and how buySAFE is specifically designed to tackle this big issue.  Jeff does a great job of laying out the requirements for effective online trust and safety solutions, and I thought you might enjoy the read.

"Stop Worrying! How to Solve the eCommerce Trust Problem. (A must read if you sell or buy online!)" by Jeff Grass on buySAFE’s blog

If you have any thoughts, insights, or comments on Jeff’s article, I would be very interested in hearing from you.

What do Digg and eBay Have in Common?

Written by Guest Blogger, Lauren Davis – Georgetown Law student

What do Digg and eBay have in common?  Their rating systems are under assault by the fraudsters, and in some cases, this mischief is undermining the systems’ credibility and effectiveness.

There has been a great deal of buzz surrounding a recent article in Wired magazine. The piece, entitled “Herding the Mob,” notes that online retail sites, such as eBay and Yahoo Auctions, and social bookmarking sites, including Digg, del.icio.us, and Reddit, share a common problem: the gaming of their community-based systems.

MySpace is Your Space. EverybodySpace.com

Written by Guest Blogger, Marc Morel – Director of Product Management, buySAFE

Web 2.0 has been ruling our world for several years now. We have all been posting, rating, blogging, podcasting, and commenting on everything from politics to the latest ball game we went to watch. This is power to the masses. And the world got better. But, did it really? I am not so sure…

eBay and Seller Certification

Skip McGrath is the CEO of Auction Seller’s Resource – a terrific newsletter for professional eBay merchants and for those folks aspiring to make a living on eBay.

Skip recently posted a series of interesting articles on the subject of seller certification on eBay.

Part 1
Can Seller Certification Bring Buyers Back to eBay

Part 2
eBay Selling Tools To Build Your Business by Preventing Fraud

Skip has done a nice job of laying out a number of things to consider, and I encourage you to give his posts a read. 

I believe Seller Certification is part of the answer for eBay (and eCommerce in general), but my big fear is that a bunch of eBay marketing folks will get together and roll out a new "seller certification" program, and that the program will fail to actually do anything meaningful for buyers or the economic health of the eBay marketplace.  Tough, effective "seller certification" programs actually require that you have to tell some sellers that they CAN’T be "certified".  In my experience, marketing folks don’t like to tell current or prospective customers that they can’t do business together.  Tough, effective certification programs are designed to limit the players on the field, and this is usually counter to everything the marketing folks think about each and every day.

eBay Feedback Farms Undermine Feedback Ratings System

Last week, Ina Steiner documented the basic story of ‘Feedback Farms’ on eBay.

I have to be honest, these scams continue to amaze me, and one has to conclude that these scams are damaging and undermining the entire feedback/merchant rating system.  If fraudsters can so easily create feedback/merchant ratings in the thousands, then buyers will have to increase their vigilance online.  From a buyer’s point of view, it continues to be more and more difficult to truly discern good from bad.

What is a “Market for Lemons”?

Lemonforsale_1 I have had a number of eBay merchants write me about a post that I made earlier this week suggesting that eBay seems to be displaying the early signs of a Market for Lemons problem (Some would argue it is far beyond the beginning stages, but I will let you debate that with your comments below).

Without focusing on eBay or eCommerce in general, it has been requested that I illustrate a simple example of how a “Market for Lemons” develops.  Obviously, there is a lot of academic research on this subject (I posted a Wharton case study by Dr. Eric Clemons earlier this week, and you won’t want to miss it since it discusses eBay’s challenges in greater depth.), and almost everybody has heard the “Market for Lemons” term utilzed at some point.  Wikipedia provides a basic overview of the Market for Lemons economic concept, so I won’t regurgitate what you can read elsewhere.

In short, the “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism” is a paper written by George Akerlof in 1970 that describes what happens to markets that suffer from information asymmetry problems.  Ultimately, Dr. Akerlof won the Nobel Prize for Economics in 2001 (along with Michael Spence and Joseph Stiglitz) for his analysis of markets with information asymmetry.  While I was at Wharton, I was fascinated by the implications of this research on eCommerce marketplaces.

The “Steve Woda LinkedIn Profile” is up and running

I spent a few minutes today working on my "Steve Woda LinkedIn Profile".  I love LinkedIn, and I like the idea of having an online profile that folks can refer to if they want to get the basics on who you are.  I have to be honest though, there are too many of these things out there, and it will be nice when one company has become the defacto standard.

This ties into my favorite subject, portable trust and reputation.  The Wall Street Journal discussed portable reputation on 8/2/06, and they mentioned a few of the companies in this space including Trufina and Opinity.  This subject is going to get bigger and bigger this next year, and I expect buySAFE will be leading the charge with its portable trust signal, the buySAFE Seal.

Important Portable Trust & Reputation blogs:
buySAFE blog
Trufina blog
Opinity blog
Rapleaf blog

Rapleaf, Portable Reputation & Portable Trust

I had a very interesting conversation last week with a smart entrepreneur named Auren Hoffman in San Francisco. His company, RapLeaf, aims to enable portable reputation signals for people and merchants. I like almost everything I heard about what RapLeaf is trying to do, and I plan to keep close tabs on and cheer for their success.  I just signed up for Rapleaf, and you can see my Rapleaf reputation here…

swoda's Rapleaf Score

I love the idea of portable trust and reputation signals.  These two things are obviously related, but it is important to note that they are different.

We consider buySAFE a portable trust signal for online merchants. Our objective is to become the world’s leading eCommerce Trust & Safety company by making every online transaction trusted, reliable and risk-free.  So far, so good.  Today, you can find the buySAFE Seal on millions of Internet and eBay listings each and every day. At buySAFE, we enable merchants to leverage our powerful trust signal and bond guarantees across all of their eCommerce sales channels including eBay, Overstock.com Auctions, TIAS, and most recently, their web storefronts.

Howitworks_wide_1

buySAFE’s trust signal is very black and white. You are either bonded or not. As a buyer, you are either going to enter into a risk-free transaction with a Bonded Seller, or you are going to enter into an uncertain transaction with a non-bonded seller.  Regardless of your feedback rating, the equation is still the same…risk-free or uncertainty! It is really that simple. Please check out these two stories on some of eBay’s former top feedback rating sellers to understand my point…GlacierBayDVD & Sell2All.

buySAFE believes that “no risk” is the only viable, future option for eCommerce. Buyers don’t want “a little bit less risk” or “substantially less risk”….. As the eCommerce markets mature, “no risk” is the only real option that merchants will be able to offer consumers if they want to attract and convert sales. buySAFE obviously believes that certainty is a powerful concept in signaling and that it is the missing piece in ecommerce transactions with unknown entities (I will be posting a lot in the future on the economic concepts that folks must understand in order to optimize their sales online).

Having said all of that, it is not an easy feat to become a Bonded Seller. You have to be a professional seller with a good reputation, previous sales experience, minimum sales volumes, and adequate financial stability in order to be a Bonded Seller.

What I like about RapLeaf is that it signals to buyers that the individual/merchant has a history of transacting fairly.  It is essentially a portable reputation signal that individuals/merchants can leverage on all of their online sales channels.  Rapleaf doesn’t ensure that you won’t have a bad experience, but it is a nice reputation signal for those individuals/merchants that cannot qualify to be Bonded Sellers.  That really is a huge benefit for online shoppers.  Frankly, I believe there will be lots of Bonded Sellers that will enjoy the extra benefit of a portable reputation whether that comes from RapLeaf or eBay or whoever.

Obviously, buySAFE doesn’t enable individuals to rate each other, and buySAFE has chosen to not to do this for a number of reasons. First, we started buySAFE on eBay, and eBay is very protective of its turf including its feedback rating system.  Obviously, the feedback system is critical to eBay’s success thus far, but that doesn’t mean it is the optimal system.  I don’t believe it is, and I will be talking more about this in future posts.

One last thought… Scot Wingo did a very nice job touching on portable reputation signals back in March.  He is a very smart guy, and his post is very insightful on this subject.  I do not agree with all of his thoughts, but his insights are very important nevertheless.  Most specifically, I disagree with Scot’s thesis that Google might be in the ideal position to provide a portable trust or reputation signal.  I believe buySAFE is in a far better position to provide the ideal portable trust signal for shoppers and merchants, and I hope to prove that to you over the coming weeks and months.

Google is an unbelievable company (I own its stock), but it is not an objective third party.  Payment providers and marketplaces, by definition, have to be buyer biased in order to create adequate buyer demand.  It is impossible for these firms to be effective “trust brokers” if they have any bias towards either party.  Google is now both a payments company (Google Checkout) and a marketplace (Google Base, AdSense, etc..).  By law, buySAFE has to be a discerning, objective mediator because we are regulated by the state insurance regulators in all 50 states.  We are required to protect buyers, but we are also required to protect the interests of sellers from bad buyers.  Google cannot and will not do that for merchants, and so, it can’t provide the optimal portable trust or reputation signal.  eBay and PayPal are obviously hampered by the same challenges.

Of course, they could always use a simple merchant rating system, but again, merchant rating systems are extremely imperfect signals, and the merchant ratings are not backed up by foolproof guarantees of seller performance.  Coincindentally, Ina Steiner of AuctionBytes wrote on the subject of Google’s Rating System this morning.

We will be talking a lot about eBay, Google, the economic concepts of signaling, and online trust & safety over the coming months, and I hope this is helpful for you.  Again, I am excited about Rapleaf, and I am cheering for their success.  I am not sure what they will be able to do with their business model, but I definitely see the value they can provide online shoppers.  Good luck Auren!

Page 2 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén